Jim Rodriguez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 28, 202117-73039California482 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

DEC 28 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JIM EDUARDO RODRIGUEZ, AKA No. 17-73039 Eduardo Rodriguez Agency No. A075-610-739 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted December 10, 2021 San Francisco, California

Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and IKUTA and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Jim Eduardo Rodriguez seeks review of a decision of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the decision of an Immigration Judge (IJ)

denying his application for adjustment of status under 8 U.S.C. § 1255(i) and a

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. waiver of inadmissibility under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(h). We have jurisdiction under

U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not err in concluding that Rodriguez is inadmissible as an alien

convicted of a crime…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.