People v. Haddad CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 28, 2021C092160California3,424 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 12/28/21 P. v. Haddad CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(San Joaquin) ----

THE PEOPLE, C092160

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. STK-CR-FE- 2019-0013874) v.

RAMY NABIL HADDAD,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Ramy Nabil Haddad repeatedly threatened a Stockton code enforcement officer and also shot and killed numerous large dogs in his neighborhood. Following his indictment, defendant requested mental health diversion under Penal Code section 1001.36,1 arguing that his offenses were the result of his underlying mental health disorder. The trial court denied defendant’s request, concluding that while defendant suffered from a mental health disorder contributing to the offenses, he posed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.