People v. Trotter CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 29, 2021B310316California2,670 words

Opinion

Opinion

BACKGROUND

Trotter admitted the murder and robbery of Charlene Belmer Hartsough while burglarizing her home, and he admitted personal use of a dangerous and deadly weapon. Trotter entered Hartsough’s home on the morning of April 23, 1986 by breaking a living room window to obtain money for drugs. While Trotter was in the middle of the burglary, Hartsough returned home. Trotter killed Hartsough by strangling her with a telephone cord and bludgeoning her head with a candlestick. Trotter turned himself in to the police before the crime was discovered. (People v. Trotter (Oct. 29, 2003, B160437) [nonpub. opn.] at p. 2 (Trotter I).) Trotter initially pleaded guilty to first degree murder (§ 187, subd. (a); count 1), residential burglary (§ 459; count 2), and robbery (§ 211; count 3). Trotter admitted the truth of

All further statutory references are to the Penal Code.

2 special circumstance allegations he committed the murder during a burglary and robbery (§ 190.2, subd. (a)(17)) and he personally used a deadly and dangerous weapon (§ 12022, subd. (b)). Trotter’s subsequent petition for writ of habeas corpus was granted, and the district court ordered a trial on the special-…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.