Perez-Pantoja

Walter Goodson v. Perez-Pantoja

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 29, 202120-16468California918 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 29 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WALTER CREG GOODSON, No. 20-16468

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-01445-RS

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PEREZ-PANTOJA, Correctional Officer,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

KELLY, Sgt./Lt. I.S.U.; M. VOONG, Chief Appeal Director; K. Z. ALLEN, Appeals Examiner; C. KOENIG, Warden; SANTIAGO, Associate Warden; C. FREEMAN, Captain at CTF-Central,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Richard Seeborg, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 7, 2021* San Francisco, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Before: LUCERO,** IKUTA, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Walter Creg Goodson (“Goodson”) filed a 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 action against Correctional Officer Perez-Pantoja (“Perez-Pantoja”) and

other prison officials in connection with the handling of his internal grievances,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.