Thomas

Thomas v. Croskrey CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 30, 2021B299272California1,061 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wiley, J.

Filed 12/30/21 Thomas v. Croskrey CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

DENISE THOMAS, B299272

Plaintiff and Appellant, Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC701476 v.

CARLY RAE CROSKREY et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Richard L. Fruin, Jr., Judge. Affirmed with directions. Ernest Calhoon for Plaintiff and Appellant. Nemecek & Cole, Jonathan B. Cole, Mark Schaeffer, and Janette S. Bodenstein for Defendants and Respondents.

____________________ The trial court granted a special motion to strike Denise Thomas’s complaint and awarded attorney fees to her opponents. Thomas asks us to reverse through a deficient brief that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.