People v. Camarena CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 30, 2021C093560California1,037 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mauro, J.

Filed 12/30/21 P. v. Camarena CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Yolo) ----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, C093560

v. (Super. Ct. No. CR-2016-531- 1)

JESUS CAMARENA,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for defendant Jesus Camarena asked this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) We will modify the judgment to lift the stay on the probation revocation fine in light of the trial court’s revocation of probation, and, to the extent there is a discrepancy in the judgment regarding the base fine and penalty assessments, further modify the judgment to reflect the imposition of a $50 base fine…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.