Jane Does v. Salesforce.com CA1/2
Opinion
Opinion
Miller, J.
Filed 12/30/21 Jane Does v. Salesforce.com CA1/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
JANE DOES #1-50,
Plaintiffs and Appellants,
A159566
v. SALESFORCE.COM, INC., (San Francisco County Super. Ct. No. CGC19574770) Defendant and Respondent.
The Jane Doe plaintiffs in this case allege that as minors they were sexually trafficked and exploited by the website “Backpage” through advertisements posted on the website by pimps and sex traffickers. They filed a complaint for damages in San Francisco Superior Court against Salesforce.com, Inc. (Salesforce), a company that allegedly contracted to provide Backpage with software and services, while knowing that Backpage was being used as a marketplace for commercial sex and sex trafficking. In their…