United States v. Zp Chandon, Official No. 650657 Zp Caymus, Official No. 647398 Zp Chalone, Official No. 644531 Zp Condon, Official No. 641296 Zp Montelena, Official No. 652154 Zp Montali, Official No. 653451 in Rem Tractug Associates v. Daniel J. Boriolo Paul Carter Kevin Boyle Norbert Seddon Mark Alioto Phil Hammond Tor Valentinsen Michael McCarthy M. Heckel Scott Fuller Richard Colonna Mark Lund John Becker Devin Dede Mike Byrnes Eric Wallischek Paul Michna Eileen Heneghan Terry Edwards Arnold Drumm Tom Evers Joseph Maggiora Donald Gates Tom Power Harold Jacobson Steve Rush Carol Meyers Keith Kridler Steven Hamre Hugh Stephens Mark Sherman Steve Mitchell, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellants

Good Law
889 F.2d 233·19 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1601·1990 A.M.C. 316·1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 16524
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 6, 198988-3980California3,421 words

Opinion

Opinion

889 F.2d 233 1990 A.M.C. 316 , 58 USLW 2301 , 19 Bankr.Ct.Dec. 1601, Bankr. L. Rep. P 73,153 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ZP CHANDON, Official No. 650657; ZP Caymus, Official No. 647398; ZP Chalone, Official No. 644531; ZP Condon, Official No. 641296; ZP Montelena, Official No. 652154; ZP Montali, Official No. 653451; In rem; Tractug Associates, Defendants-Appellees, v. Daniel J. BORIOLO; Paul Carter; Kevin Boyle; Norbert Seddon; Mark Alioto; Phil Hammond; Tor Valentinsen; Michael McCarthy; M. Heckel; Scott Fuller; Richard Colonna; Mark Lund; John Becker; Devin Dede; Mike Byrnes; Eric Wallischek; Paul Michna; Eileen Heneghan; Terry Edwards; Arnold Drumm; Tom Evers; Joseph Maggiora; Donald Gates; Tom Power; Harold Jacobson; Steve Rush; Carol Meyers; Keith Kridler; Steven Hamre; Hugh Stephens; Mark Sherman; Steve Mitchell, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellants. No. 88-3980. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 12, 1989. Decided Nov. 6, 1989. George H. Luhrs, Seattle, Wash., for plaintiffs-intervenors-appellants. R. Michael Underhill, Asst. U.S. Atty., Torts Branch, Civ. Div., San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.