United States v. Ronald R. Rewald

Caution
103 A.L.R. Fed. 159·889 F.2d 836·1989 WL 135361·1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 16951
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 13, 198985-1353California19,256 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hall, J.

Defendant-Appellant Ronald R. Rewald was convicted on ninety-four counts of a criminal indictment charging mail fraud, interstate transportation of stolen securities or money, false statement to a federal officer, perjury, falsely representing accounts as being insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), securities fraud, failure to maintain books and records as required by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), fraud by an investment advisor, income tax evasion, and subscribing to a false document. Re-wald committed these crimes by swindling hundreds of investors in his investment firm out of millions of dollars. His principal defense at trial, and now on appeal, is that the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) told him to spend the investors’ money extravagantly so as to cultivate relationships with foreign potentates and wealthy businessmen who would be useful intelligence sources. We reject all of Rewald’s arguments save one, which requires a remand to the district court for further proceedings.

I

In 1978, Rewald and a partner, Sunlin L.S. Wong, formed an investment firm named Bishop, Baldwin, Rewald, Dilling-ham and Wong (Bishop Baldwin), located in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.