Jenkins

Jenkins v. Cole

Good Law
889 F.2d 1095·1989 WL 143104
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 27, 198936-3_13California457 words

Opinion

Opinion

889 F.2d 1095 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Darryl A. JENKINS, and other Mercer Island Residents, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Edward E. COLE, and his business, Wescom Communications, Defendant-Appellee. No. 88-4386. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 31, 1989. * Decided Nov. 27, 1989. Before ALARCON, O'SCANNLAIN and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Darryl A. Jenkins appeals from the district court's denial of class certification under Fed.R.Civ.P. 23, dismissal of his complaint for lack of standing, and denial of a preliminary injunction. We affirm. 3 Jenkins' pro se complaint roughly alleges that Cole, who certifies police radar detectors, has lied about the accuracy of radar detectors, resulting in many wrongful convictions for speeding in the Mercer Island area, including Jenkins' son's conviction. He brings this action on behalf of himself and the residents of Mercer Island. 4 The district court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.