United States v. Michael Eugene Harkey

Good Law
890 F.2d 1082·1989 WL 145366·1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 18100
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 4, 198989-30057California586 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wright, J.

We consider whether the district court properly refused to sentence Michael Eugene Harkey under 18 U.S.C. § 924 (e)(1), the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA). We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Harkey was found guilty by a jury of being a felon illegally possessing a firearm, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(1). The government urged the court to enhance his sentence under the ACCA, arguing that his five prior convictions qualified as the basis of sentence enhancement. In a published opinion, Judge Quackenbush held that second degree burglary, as defined in Wash. Rev.Code § 9A.52.030, does not qualify as a basis for sentence enhancement under the ACCA. United States v. Harkey, 709 F.Supp. 977, 985 (E.D.Wash.1989). He was sentenced to five years imprisonment. The government appeals. We affirm.

ANALYSIS

The ACCA provides that a person convicted of § 922(g) who also has three prior convictions for a violent felony shall be imprisoned not less than fifteen years. 18 U.S.C. § 924 (e)(1). Violent felony is defined in the ACCA as a crime punishable by imprisonment for longer than a year that:

18 U.S.C. § 924 (e)(2)(B)(ii).

This court held recently that Congress intended the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.