Interpool Limited v. Char Yigh Marine (Panama) S.A.

Good Law
890 F.2d 1453·1989 WL 145364·11 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 426·1990 A.M.C. 1·1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 18101
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 4, 198987-6643California4,688 words

Opinion

Opinion

Trott, J.

In this admiralty, breach of contract action, Interpool, Ltd. (“Interpool”) appeals the district court’s order vacating its previous order granting Interpool’s application for a right to attach the vessel C.C. San Francisco. Jurisdiction is proper and the appeal is timely. We vacate the district court’s (second) order and remand for further proceedings consistent with this ruling.

BACKGROUND

Between July, 1978 and January, 1983, Interpool (a Bahamian corporation) entered into a series of written agreements with Char Ching Marine (a Hong Kong corporation) and its related Taiwanese, Hong Kong, and Panamanian companies, which operated collectively as C.C. Line. These agreements provided that Interpool would lease cargo containers to Char Ching Marine to be used by C.C. Line in connection with its transpacific shipping service between ports in Asia and the United States.

One of the container-carrying vessels in the C.C. Line was the C.C. San Francisco. Instead of obtaining a straightforward ship mortgage for the vessel, C.C. Line financed the C.C. San Francisco by a series of transactions whereby C.C. Line became the lessee of the ship and a third party — owned by a lending…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.