In re Golden Plan of California, Inc.

891 F.2d 294 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re GOLDEN PLAN OF CALIFORNIA, INC., a California corporation, Debtor and Related Entities. Lester N. HIXSON and Rebecca Hixson, Appellants, v. REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 102 E. HARNEY LANE, LODI, CALIFORNIA, et al., Appellees. No. 88-15681. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 7, 1989. * Decided Dec. 6, 1989. Before ALARCON, O'SCANNLAIN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 The appellants in this case failed to file a notice of appeal in the district court from the bankruptcy court's entry of an order of summary judgment within the ten-day requirement of Fed.R.Bankr. 8002(a). The appellants also failed to request an extension of time to file a notice of appeal pursuant to Fed.R.Bankr. 8002(c) or to show excusable neglect why they had failed to file a request for such an extension within the time limit prescribed by Rule 8002(c). The district court dismissed the appeal for lack of…