Crompton and Knowles Corporation v. Frank Carmi and Carmi Flavor and Fragrance Co., Inc.

891 F.2d 294 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. CROMPTON AND KNOWLES CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Frank CARMI and Carmi Flavor and Fragrance Co., Inc., Defendants-Appellants. No. 88-6266. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 6, 1989. Decided Dec. 6, 1989. Before SKOPIL, FLETCHER, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Frank Carmi and Carmi Flavor and Fragrance Company (CFF) appeal the district court's denial of relief against Crompton and Knowles Corporation (Crompton) for claimed violations of two provisions of a settlement agreement between Crompton and CFF embodied in a constant decree. The court did find Crompton liable for violation of a third provision. Crompton has not appealed that ruling. CFF claims that the district court misinterpreted the agreement and also erred in finding Crompton had not violated the two provisions. We affirm. FACTS 3 Frank Carmi, CFF, and Crompton entered into a Consent Decree…