Bank of Maui, Nat. Ass'n v. Estate Analysis, Inc.

Good Law
891 F.2d 294·1989 WL 150079·1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 18542
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 4, 198988-15430California520 words

Opinion

Opinion

891 F.2d 294 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. BANK OF MAUI, National Association, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ESTATE ANALYSIS, INC., dba Zales Insurance, William Z. Zales, T. Sue Zales, Western United Life Assurance Co., Transamerica Insurance Group, Transamerica Insurance Company, Transamerica Premiere Insurance Company, Triad Insurance Agency, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 88-15430. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 4, 1989. Before ALARCON, O'SCANNLAIN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** OVERVIEW 2 The Bank of Maui ("Bank") appeals the district court's order affirming the bankruptcy court's award of sanctions under Bankruptcy Rule 9011 1 to Transamerica Insurance Group ("Transamerica") and Estate Analysis on the ground the Bank's complaint was unwarranted under existing law, legally erroneous, and frivolous. We reverse the award of sanctions. DISCUSSION 3 The issue raised is whether the Bank's argument that it had standing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.