Branson v. Burnett

891 F.2d 294 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Carl B. BRANSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GTE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS CORP. and AG Communication Systems Corporation, Defendant-Appellee. Carl B. BRANSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ralph BURNETT, GTE Communications Systems Corp., Defendants-Appellees. No. 88-2572. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 6, 1989. * Decided Dec. 1, 1989. Before ALARCON, O'SCANNLAIN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Carl Branson ("Branson") appeals pro se from the dismissal of his action against GTE Communications Systems Corp. ("GTE") (D.C.Civ. 87-1909 PHX CLH) and the dismissal of his separate action against GTE and one of its employees, Ralph Burnett (D.C.Civ. 87-1720 PHX CAM). The two actions were consolidated on appeal. 3 After a review of the entire record, we affirm the orders for the reasons stated therein filed in Civ. 87-1909 PHX CLH, on February 16, 1988, March 15, 1988, and March 22, 1988,…