Owens v. Bielaski

Good Law
891 F.2d 295·1989 WL 150172·1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 18494
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 6, 198988-15629California850 words

Opinion

Opinion

891 F.2d 295 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Nathan S. SCHWARTZ, Debtor. Wyatt OWENS, Administrator for the Estate of Nathan S. Schwartz, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John BIELASKI, Dave Allen, Does I Through C, X, Y, and Z Corporations, A, B, and C Partnerships, Defendants-Appellees. No. 88-15629. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 30, 1989. * Decided Dec. 6, 1989. Before ALARCON, O'SCANNLAIN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Appellant Wyatt Owens, Administrator for the Estate of Nathan S. Schwartz, appeals from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's (BAP) order denying Owens' motion to reconsider the BAP's Order of Dismissal. Owens contends that the BAP abused its discretion in denying his motion to reconsider the Order of Dismissal. We remand for reconsideration in light of the principles enunciated in this memorandumn disposition. 3 On March 21, 1988 the bankruptcy judge filed an order denying Owens' then pending motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.