James Garcia Montano, v Navajo County Sheriff's Department, Sam William Egbert, David Michael Reese

Good Law
891 F.2d 295·1989 WL 150086·1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 18408
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 4, 198989-15058California373 words

Opinion

Opinion

891 F.2d 295 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. James Garcia MONTANO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v NAVAJO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, Sam William Egbert, David Michael Reese, Defendants-Appellees. No. 89-15058. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 6, 1989. * Decided Dec. 4, 1989. Before ALARCON, O'SCANNLAIN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 * Montano sued the defendants under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1982). He appeals both the district court's order of summary judgment in favor of the defendants and its denial of his motion for reconsideration of that order. We affirm. II 3 Defendants moved for summary judgment and submitted a Statement of Facts, affidavits, interrogatories, and records in support of their motion. Montano submitted nothing in opposition. Because his complaint contains merely conclusory allegations of liability of the defendants, we affirm the district court's order of summary judgment. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.