James W. Menefield v. James Rowland, Robert Borg

891 F.2d 295 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. James W. MENEFIELD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James ROWLAND, Robert Borg, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 89-15536. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 8, 1989. * Decided Dec. 4, 1989. Before ALARCON, O'SCANNLAIN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Appellant Menefield, a California state prisoner, filed pro se a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action in district court alleging that his constitutional rights were violated when he was assaulted twice by correctional officers and transferred to administrative segregation in retaliation for complaining about the assaults. Menefield sought a preliminary injunction to enjoin the correctional officers from further harassing him. Adopting the magistrate's findings and recommendations, the district court denied Menefield's motion for preliminary injunctive relief. Menefield now appeals pro se from the district court's judgment. 3 * The legal…