Antonio Roman-Pasillaz v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

891 F.2d 295 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Antonio ROMAN-PASILLAZ, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 89-70127. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 31, 1989. * Decided Dec. 4, 1989. Before ALARCON, O'SCANNLAIN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** OVERVIEW 2 Antonio Roman-Pasillaz ("Pasillaz"), a native and citizen of Mexico, seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") final order dismissing his appeal and affirming the Immigration Judge's ("IJ") decision finding him deportable and otherwise not entitled to relief under § 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the "Act"). We affirm. DISCUSSION I. Finding of Deportability 3 For the first time on appeal, Pasillaz challenges the IJ's finding of deportability under section 241(a)(11) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (a)(11). Absent overriding circumstances, failure to raise an issue in an appeal to the BIA…