Lucas v. Natoli

891 F.2d 295 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Janet LUCAS, personally and as the personal representative of the Estate of Andrew Robert Lucas and as Guardian for Mark Andrew Lucas and Deborah Lynn Lucas, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INNOCENZO NATOLI, Jane Doe Natoli, husband and wife, Filippo Quinci, Jane Doe Quinci, husband and wife, Paul Oakman, Jane Doe Oakman, husband and wife, Hughes Helicopters, Inc., a corporation and division of McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Birds Nest Corporation, a corporation, Atun, C.A., M/V Mary Patricia, Melvin Cain, Individually, Skydance Helicopters, Defendants-Appellees, Van Camp Sea Foods, a corporation and division of Ralston Purina Company, Defendant-Appellee No. 88-6207. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 2, 1989. Decided Dec. 1, 1989. Before HUG, CANBY and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Janet Lucas timely appeals the district court's dismissal of her complaint. 1 The…