Orvin C. Stanwood v. Western Merchantile Agency, Inc., Robert E. Jones, John Doe, 1-10, Jane Doe, 1-10

891 F.2d 295 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Orvin C. STANWOOD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WESTERN MERCHANTILE AGENCY, INC., Robert E. Jones, John Doe, 1-10, Jane Doe, 1-10, Defendants-Appellees. No. 88-4417. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 6, 1989. * Decided Dec. 1, 1989. Before ALARCON, O'SCANNLAIN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Orvin Stanwood ("Stanwood") appeals pro se from the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985 , 1986 action against Western Merchantile Agency on the grounds it was barred by the applicable statute of limitations. We affirm. 3 Stanwood alleges that defendants 1 conspired to deprive him of his right to due process by entering an unconstitutional judgment of default. The default judgment at issue was entered against Stanwood on September 19, 1986. This civil rights action was filed more than two years later on September 27, 1988. The statute of limitations for civil rights actions is…