Dennis Jay Heinlen v. Duane Vild, Warden Arizona State Prison, Dean Hodges, Librarian, Arizona State Prison, Gary White, Cps, Arizona State Prison

891 F.2d 295 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Dennis Jay HEINLEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Duane VILD, Warden Arizona State Prison, Dean Hodges, Librarian, Arizona State Prison, Gary White, CPS, Arizona State Prison, Defendants-Appellees. No. 89-15770. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 6, 1989. * Decided Dec. 6, 1989. Before ALARCON, O'SCANNLAIN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 After a de novo review of the record on appeal in this section 1983 action, we affirm the order of the district court filed April 23, 1989, which granted summary judgment to the defendants on the basis of our decision in Lindquist v. Idaho State Bd. of Corrections, 776 F.2d 851 (9th Cir.1985). We affirm in part for the reasons stated in the order of the district court. We also conclude the appellant has failed to allege facts to show that he was denied meaningful access to the courts. See Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817 (1977). 3 Recently, we…