United States v. Curtis Gene Pulley

891 F.2d 296 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Curtis Gene PULLEY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 88-5068. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 3, 1989. * Decided Dec. 1, 1989. Before FLETCHER, FERGUSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 * MEMORANDUM ** 2 Appellant Curtis Gene Pulley appeals the district court's denial of his motion for a pre-trial continuance and denial of his motion for a request for services under 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(e). We affirm. 3 On January 30, 1987, Curtis Gene Pulley was indicted in a one-count indictment alleging bank larceny, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (b). 4 On March 31, 1987, Pulley renewed his March 23 motion to dismiss his counsel of record, and represent himself in the case. He also moved for a continuance. The court allowed his counsel to withdraw and set a trial date of April 21, 1987. On the morning of the trial, Pulley moved for another…