United States v. Antonio Perez-Gomez

891 F.2d 296 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio PEREZ-GOMEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 86-5103. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 13, 1989. * Decided Dec. 1, 1989. Before SCHROEDER, BOOCHEVER, and BEEZER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Antonio Perez-Gomez appeals his conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine, possession with intent to distribute cocaine, and distribution of cocaine. Perez-Gomez contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the convictions. Because Perez-Gomez failed to renew his motion for acquittal at the end of the trial, we review only for a manifest miscarriage of justice. United States v. Larson, 507 F.2d 385, 387 (9th Cir.1974). We affirm. 3 * Perez-Gomez was arrested after an undercover FBI agent purchased cocaine at a restaurant at which Perez-Gomez worked. Perez-Gomez was present before and during the sale. The…