United States v. Clarence Douglas Malcolm

891 F.2d 296 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clarence Douglas MALCOLM, Defendant-Appellant. No. 88-5473. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Dec. 8, 1989. Before ALARCON, O'SCANNLAIN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Clarence Douglas Malcolm appeals from the district court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence and his subsequent conviction for manufacturing and possessing counterfeit currency, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 471 and 472. 3 Malcolm claims the district court erred in (1) upholding the validity of the initial attempt by the police to stop the van in which Malcolm was a passenger; and (2) denying his motion to suppress the fruits of the search of a vehicle into which Malcolm and codefendant Williams had been seen loading boxes. We affirm. 4 * On Saturday, April 9, 1988, at approximately 7:40 A.M., Kenneth Bramblett, the production supervisor of Gateway Business…