United States v. Rabit Noel Rivera

Good Law
891 F.2d 296·1989 WL 150179·1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 18425
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 6, 198989-30034California783 words

Opinion

Opinion

891 F.2d 296 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rabit Noel RIVERA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 89-30034. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 23, 1989. * Decided Dec. 6, 1989. Before ALARCON, O'SCANNLAIN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Rabit Noel Rivera appeals his conviction following a jury trial for possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). Rivera contends that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence discovered after a Terry investigative stop because the arresting officer did not have a reasonable articulable suspicion that Rivera was a drug courier. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm. 3 The district court's ruling on the legality of an investigative stop is a mixed question of law and fact that we review de novo. United States v. Ayarza, 874 F.2d 647,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.