United States v. Heroel Hernandez

Good Law
891 F.2d 296
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 21, 198988-5210California1,175 words

Opinion

Opinion

891 F.2d 296 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Heroel HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 88-5210. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 4, 1989. Decided Dec. 6, 1989. As Amended Dec. 21, 1989. Before GOODWIN, Chief Judge, SCHROEDER, and BEEZER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Defendant-Appellant Heroel Hernandez appeals his convictions following a jury trial of one count of conspiracy to aid and abet the possession and distribution of controlled substances ( 21 U.S.C. § 846 ) and two counts of money laundering ( 18 U.S.C. § 1956 ). Hernandez challenges his conviction on numerous grounds, claiming error in the admission of prior bad act evidence, formulation of the jury instructions, exclusion of certain defense evidence, and denial of two discovery requests. We find no error sufficient to warrant reversal of the convictions and therefore affirm. 3 The investigation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.