United States v. Stanley Reppucci

891 F.2d 296 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stanley REPPUCCI, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 89-10025, 89-10027 and 89-10028. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 5, 1989 * . Decided Dec. 6, 1989. Before SKOPIL, FLETCHER, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Stanley Reppucci appeals the denial without explanation of his Rule 35 motion requesting a sentence reduction based on the disparity between his sentence and that of a later-sentenced, more culpable co-conspirator. We affirm. FACTS The Indictments 3 Defendant Stanley Reppucci was charged in three indictments, each with several counts. The first involved a marijuana purchase in Florida; it was transferred to Nevada under Rule 20. The second concerned an attempted marijuana purchase in Nevada, and the third, transactions in counterfeit watch dials. 4 The first indictment resulted from a two-year Florida FBI and sheriff's…