Glanzman v. Uniroyal, Inc.

Good Law
892 F.2d 58
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 19, 198988-4072California1,946 words

Opinion

Opinion

892 F.2d 58 Prod.Liab.Rep. (CCH) P 12,334 Benjamin T. GLANZMAN, individually; Harold Robbins, as guardian Ad Litem for his minor child, Patrick D. Robbins; Harold Robbins, individually, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNIROYAL, INC., aka/Uniroyal Tire Company, a New Jersey corporation, Defendant-Appellant. No. 88-4072. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 5, 1989. Decided Dec. 19, 1989. Gary L. Morgan, Caldwell, Idaho, for plaintiffs-appellees. Patrick D. Furey, Imhoff & Lynch, Boise, Idaho, for defendant-appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho. Before NELSON, BOOCHEVER and TROTT, Circuit Judges. NELSON, Circuit Judge: 1 This case comes to us on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho. We affirm and impose sanctions on the appellant. BACKGROUND 2 On April 17, 1985, Benjamin Glanzman and his passenger were injured when a tire on their vehicle blew out. Glanzman brought a products liability action against Uniroyal in Idaho state court alleging claims in negligence, strict product liability, and breach of warranty. Uniroyal removed the action to the United States District Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.