James Conway v. Pamela Johnson, M.D., Joe Vatter, M.D., Daniel Buhler, M.D., Oakland Police Officer, A. Boyuvich (Badge No. 353), Oakland Police Officer, R. Hassan (Badge No. 645)

Good Law
892 F.2d 82·1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 18861
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 11, 198987-1824California1,122 words

Opinion

Opinion

892 F.2d 82 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. James CONWAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Pamela JOHNSON, M.D., Joe Vatter, M.D., Daniel Buhler, M.D., Oakland Police Officer, A. Boyuvich (Badge No. 353), Oakland Police Officer, R. Hassan (Badge No. 645), et al., Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 87-1824, 87-2219. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 26, 1989. * Decided Dec. 11, 1989. Before ALARCON, O'SCANNLAIN and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 The plaintiff, James Conway, appearing pro se, appeals from the district court's orders dismissing the action brought under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 because the statute of limitations had run and denying his request for reconsideration and leave to amend brought under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). We affirm. 3 Conway's complaint alleged that his civil rights were violated when the defendants refused to admit him to a hospital and allegedly subjected him to false arrest and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.