Addleman v. Dolliver

892 F.2d 82 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Lincoln Lane ADDLEMAN, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Chief Justice DOLLIVER, Washington State Supreme Court; Paul J. Wasson; Kenneth Helm; George H. Revelle; Howard K. Todd; Robert S. Lasnik; Ronald Kessler; John Muenster, Defendants- Appellees. No. 88-3772. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 14, 1989. * Decided Nov. 30, 1989. Before JAMES R. BROWNING, ALARCON and CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMEMORANUM ** 2 Plaintiff Lincoln Addleman appeals from the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 actions for failure to state a claim. Addleman alleges in his civil rights complaint that a justice of the Washington State Supreme Court, a superior court judge, two prosecuting attorneys, and two court clerks violated his constitutional rights by violating his plea bargain agreement, conspiring to lose his motion to vacate judgment, and imposing…