Sarah Batie v. Steamship M/v Stardancer

Good Law
892 F.2d 82·1989 WL 155922·1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 19473
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 26, 198989-35387California1,237 words

Opinion

Opinion

892 F.2d 82 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Sarah BATIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STEAMSHIP M/V STARDANCER, et al., Defendant-Appellee. No. 89-35387. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 4, 1989. Decided Dec. 26, 1989. Before WALLACE, PREGERSON, and NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** SUMMARY 2 Sarah Batie ("Appellant") brought suit in a Washington State district court against Steamship M/V Stardancer ("appellee"), a cruise ship on which appellant was a passenger, and against Admiral Cruises, Inc. ("appellee"), the corporation that sold appellant her cruise ticket. The district court dismissed the complaint for lack of jurisdiction over the defendants. After the deadline for appealing the decision had passed, appellant brought a motion for relief from the order pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6). The district court denied the motion. Appellant now appeals that denial. 3 We affirm the district court's order denying the motion for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.