Patterson v. Municipality of Anchorage
Opinion
Opinion
892 F.2d 83 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Tommie G. PATTERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE; Steinmetz, Officer; Reagn, Officer; BILL CASTRO, Officer; Grimes, Officer; Walter Stein, Officer; Polar, Officer; Carter, Officer; B.J., Officer; Robert Netty, Officer; Bumdy, District Attorney; Common Guititerious; John Selini; Mac Wilberton; Zanhyzer, Attorney; R. J. Moody, Judge; Elaine Andrews, Judge; J. Seimoor, Defendants-Appellees. No. 88-3879. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 1, 1989. * Decided Dec. 13, 1989. Before JAMES R. BROWNING, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Plaintiff claimed in a previous action filed in the state of Alaska that defendants unlawfully entered his residence. Patterson v. Municipality of Anchorage, No. 3AN-80-7935 (Alaska Dist.Ct. filed Nov. 19, 1980). The Alaska court dismissed his action with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Id. (dismissal order Mar. 7,…