Tommy Vander Jackson v. Ed Myers, Superintendent Attorney General of the State of California

892 F.2d 83 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Tommy Vander JACKSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ed MYERS, Superintendent; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees. No. 89-55043. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 1, 1989. Decided Dec. 19, 1989. Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jackson filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in district court claiming that the prosecutor's suppression of evidence and failure to correct false evidence denied him due process of law and that he was also denied his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation and cross-examination. The district court dismissed his petition on the grounds that he had not properly presented his due process claims to the California Supreme Court, and thus had not exhausted state remedies. Jackson alleges that his claims were separately presented to the California Supreme Court in two petitions for review: His…