United States v. Andres M. Medina, Adolph Gonzales Delgado

892 F.2d 84 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andres M. MEDINA, Adolph Gonzales Delgado, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 88-1491, 88-1493. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 3, 1989. Decided Dec. 19, 1989. Before FLETCHER, FERGUSON and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Adolph Gonzales Delgado and Andres M. Medina appeal from their convictions arising out of a conspiracy to possess cocaine with the intent to distribute it, and the actual possession with intent to distribute that substance. More specifically, Delgado claims that the district court erred when it refused to give an entrapment instruction, and refused to dismiss the indictment for outrageous government conduct. For his part, Medina claims that his case should have been severed from Delgado's, and also objects to the admission of Delgado's testimony regarding a prior drug deal in which he and Medina…