United States v. Robert James Walton

892 F.2d 84 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert James WALTON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 88-1283. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 21, 1989. * Decided Dec. 13, 1989. Before GOODWIN, POOLE and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Following a remand for resentencing, Robert James Walton appeals pro se his sentence imposed for bank robbery and assault, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2113 (a) and (d), and for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. App. II § 1202(a). Walton contends that: (1) his sentence is ambiguous; (2) he has been denied parole consideration and has been held in a maximum security prison because of his initial illegal sentence; (3) he received ineffective assistance of counsel at his resentencing hearing; (4) no factual basis exists for his plea of guilty to armed bank robbery and assault; and (5) his sentence is…