United States v. Daroush Broumand Nahiji

892 F.2d 84 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daroush Broumand NAHIJI, Defendant-Appellant. No. 88-5381. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 11, 1989. Decided Dec. 13, 1989. 1 Before SCHROEDER and BEEZER, Circuit Judges, and SAMUEL P. KING * , District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Defendant/Appellant Daroush Broumand Nahiji ("Nahiji") appeals the district court's denial of his motion to suppress his post-arrest statements. We affirm. 4 Nahiji was charged with possession with intent to distribute approximately one kilogram of cocaine. Upon the denial of his motion to suppress, Nahiji pled guilty to the charge. The United States District Court for the Central District of California, the Honorable Mariana Pfaelzer presiding, sentenced Nahiji to five years in prison, with a four-year period of supervised release to follow. 5 The circumstances surrounding the guilty plea evince a clear…