United States v. Paul F. Kendrick
Opinion
Opinion
892 F.2d 84 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul F. KENDRICK, Defendant-Appellant. No. 88-1142. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 21, 1989. * Decided Dec. 13, 1989. Before GOODWIN, Chief Judge, and POOLE and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Paul F. Kendrick, appearing pro se, appeals the district court's denial of his motion to modify his sentence, made pursuant to a procedure provided by the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 (the Act). Kendrick timely appeals. 1 3 Kendrick contends that the 10 year sentence imposed upon him for his mail fraud conviction in 1985, and the five years incarceration he received for violating his 1982 probation require modification under the Act's procedure codified at 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (c)(2). This court has affirmed Kendrick's conviction for fourteen counts of mail fraud and revocation of his probation. United States v. Kendrick, Nos.…