Randall N. Wiideman v. Steve B. Wolfson

892 F.2d 85 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Randall N. WIIDEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Steve B. WOLFSON, et al. Defendants-Appellees No. 87-1992. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 21, 1989. * Decided Dec. 13, 1989. As Amended May 17, 1990. Before GOODWIN, POOLE and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Wiideman, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6) of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Wiideman contends that his action stated a claim for relief under 12 U.S.C. § 3402 , the Right to Financial Privacy Act. We affirm the district court's dismissal. 3 Title 12, U.S.C. § 3402 prohibits financial institutions from providing any "government authority" with information concerning a customer's financial records unless the customer authorizes disclosure or the government authority obtains a valid subpoena or warrant. 12 U.S.C. § 3402 ; United States v. Frazin, 780…