Reynaldo Gonzalez v. Google LLC
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
REYNALDO GONZALEZ; THE ESTATE No. 18-16700
OF NOHEMI GONZALEZ; BEATRIZ
GONZALEZ, Individually and as D.C. No. Administrator of the Estate of 4:16-cv-03282- Nohemi Gonzalez; JOSE DMR
HERNANDEZ; REY GONZALEZ; PAUL
GONZALEZ,
Plaintiffs-Appellants, ORDER
v.
GOOGLE LLC,
Defendant-Appellee.
Filed January 3, 2022
Before: Ronald M. Gould, Marsha S. Berzon, and Morgan Christen, Circuit Judges.
Order; Dissent by Judge Gould SUMMARY*
Anti-Terrorism Act
The panel filed an order denying a petition for panel rehearing and denying, on behalf of the court, a petition for rehearing en banc in an appeal in which the panel affirmed the district court’s dismissal of an action under the Anti- Terrorism Act on the grounds that most of the plaintiffs’ claims were barred under § 230 of the Communications Decency Act, and plaintiffs otherwise failed to state a claim.
Dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc, Judge Gould wrote that he dissented for the reasons stated in his panel opinion dissenting in part.