People v. McCoshum CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 2022C092483California3,582 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 1/4/22 P. v. McCoshum CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Shasta) ----

THE PEOPLE, C092483

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. Nos. 19F4821, 19F2832, 19F4117, 19F4697, v. 19F4704, 19F4816)

JOSEPH LEON McCOSHUM,

Defendant and Appellant.

In a global resolution of several cases, defendant Joseph Leon McCoshum entered no contest and guilty pleas and admitted enhancements in exchange for a negotiated sentence. 1 As part of the agreement, defendant agreed to a Cruz2 waiver, pursuant to which he was

Defendant’s negotiated sentence required he travel to Oregon to resolve a legal dispute and return to California within one…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.