People v. Mariscal CA2/6
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 2022B311259ACalifornia3,188 words
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 1/4/22 P. v. Mariscal CA2/6 Opinion following rehearing
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
Calif ornia Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties f rom citing or relying on opinions not certif ied f or publication or ordered published, except as specif ied by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certif ied f or publication or ordered published f or purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SIX
THE PEOPLE, 2d Crim. No. B311259 (Super. Ct. No. 2010028681) Plaintiff and Respondent, (Ventura County)
v. OPINION FOLLOWING
REHEARING
GERARDO GARCIA
MARISCAL,
Defendant and Appellant.
Gerardo Garcia Mariscal appeals from the trial court’s denial of his petition for resentencing (Pen. Code, § 1170.95).1 He contends there was insufficient evidence he acted with reckless indifference to human life. We affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Murder of Uriel Bucio
1 Subsequent undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.…