Chango Coffee v. Applied Underwriters CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 2022B297432California4,897 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 1/4/22 Chango Coffee v. Applied Underwriters CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

CHANGO COFFEE, INC., B297432

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC591586) v.

APPLIED UNDERWRITERS, INC.,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Randolph M. Hammock, Judge. Affirmed. Thomas Montague Hall for Plaintiff and Appellant. Fine, Boggs & Perkins, Michael K. Perkins and William D. Wheelock for Defendant and Respondent. ‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗ Plaintiff Chango Coffee, Inc. (Chango) challenges a grant of summary judgment for defendant Applied Underwriters, Inc. (AUI). Chango contends the trial court erred by granting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.