United States v. Gabriel Clark-Aigner

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 4, 202217-36006California636 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

JAN 4 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-36006

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 3:16-cv-00095-TMB 3:02-cr-00007-SLG-1 v.

GABRIEL CLARK-AIGNER, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska Sharon L. Gleason, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 9, 2021** Seattle, Washington

Before: McKEOWN and BADE, Circuit Judges, and FITZWATER,*** District Judge.

Gabriel Clark-Aigner (“Clark-Aigner”) and accomplices were indicted for

participating in two completed robberies and one attempted robbery of a motel in

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Sidney A. Fitzwater, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Texas, sitting by designation. Anchorage, Alaska.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.