Leticia Barron v. State of California
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 5, 202219-55127California1,095 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 5 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LETICIA BARRON, No. 19-55127
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 8:17-cv-01275-JVS-KES v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA; et al., MEMORANDUM*
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California James V. Selna, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted December 10, 2021 Pasadena, California
Before: W. FLETCHER, RAWLINSON, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
Leticia Barron brought a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that California
Highway Patrol Officer Daniel Agee used excessive force when he shot and killed
her son. She now appeals from the district court’s judgment following a jury
verdict in favor of the defendants, and she seeks a new trial on the grounds that (1)
the trial judge made an improper comment during the testimony of Barron’s
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. forensic expert, Jeffrey…