Kristi Adams v. County of Maricopa

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 5, 202220-17299California1,237 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 5 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KRISTI ADAMS, No. 20-17299

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-05253-MTL

v.

MEMORANDUM*

COUNTY OF MARICOPA,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Michael T. Liburdi, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted November 17, 2021 Phoenix, Arizona

Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, CLIFTON, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Kristi Adams is a former employee of the County of Maricopa (“County”).

Ms. Adams appeals the district court’s summary judgment in her action against the

County under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et

seq., and the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. We have jurisdiction

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and review de novo. We affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

I. Unlawful Discharge under the Acts

Discrimination claims…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.