Constance George v. House of Hope Recovery

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 5, 202218-35551California1,253 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

JAN 5 2022

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

CONSTANCE GEORGE, No. 18-35551

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:15-cv-01277-SB District of Oregon, v. Portland

PATRICIA BARCROFT; et al.,

ORDER

Defendants-Appellees.

Before: GRABER and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges, and R. COLLINS,* District Judge.

The memorandum disposition filed on November 18, 2021 is amended, and

the amended memorandum disposition is filed concurrently with this order. The

panel has unanimously voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. The petition

for panel rehearing (Dkt. 94) is DENIED. No future petitions for rehearing or

rehearing en banc will be entertained.

* The Honorable Raner C. Collins, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation.

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

JAN 5 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CONSTANCE GEORGE, No. 18-35551

Plaintiff-Appellant, …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.