Goodwin
Goodwin v. Comerica Bank, N.A.
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 1/5/22 (unmodified opn. attached)
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FOUR
MARK GOODWIN,
A160909
Plaintiff and Appellant, (Alameda County v. Super. Ct. No. RG17855144)
COMERICA BANK, N.A., ORDER MODIFYING OPINION
AND DENYING REHEARING;
Defendant and Respondent. NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT
THE COURT:
It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on December 15, 2021, be modified as follows:
On page 16, line 6, after the words “Goodwin’s petition to confirm the award,” add as footnote 10 the following footnote,
10 To the extent Comerica suggests that the arbitrator’s misleading description of the Hernandez resolution was an affirmative misrepresentation independently bringing his impartiality into question and requiring his disqualification, the same analysis applies. Comerica learned the correct facts prior to submitting its opposition to Goodwin’s fee motion and failed to raise the issue until after the arbitrator ruled on the motion, thereby forfeiting the issue.