Wade E. Blacksmith v. County of Sierra, and Derrick Greenwood Joseph G. Moseley Steven J. Peterson

892 F.2d 1045 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Wade E. BLACKSMITH, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. COUNTY OF SIERRA, et al., Defendant, and Derrick Greenwood; Joseph G. Moseley; Steven J. Peterson, Defendants-Appellants. No. 88-2827. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 9, 1989. Decided Jan. 5, 1990. Before HUG, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Plaintiff Wade Blacksmith brought a civil rights action under 28 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging violations of his first, fourth, fifth, eighth and fourteenth amendment rights, as well as a number of pendent state law claims, against three deputy sheriffs of Sierra County California. The action arose out of various incidents involved in Blacksmith's arrest and detention on June 2, 1986 for possession of illegal weapons. The defendants moved for summary judgment on the ground of qualified immunity. The district court denied the motion. Defendants appeal. 3 We have jurisdiction…